Reposted from August 13, 2008
"The theory of hormesis has been around for decades, but has long been met with scepticism or downright suspicion. In recent years, however, biologists have pieced together a clear molecular explanation of how it works, and hormesis has finally been accepted as a fundamental principle of biology and biomedicine. The question now is how to take advantage of hormesis to live longer and healthier lives." Mark Mattson & Edwin Calabrese, New Science, 6 Aug 2008
Homeopathic medicine has been sneered at by allopathic believers for a long time now. Probably since the Swiss physician and alchemist Paracelsus recognized the concept of hormesis, or "a process whereby organisms exposed to low levels of stress or toxins become more resistant to tougher challenges." (See cited article.) We also have been hearing in the news recently that a bit of germs and dirt actually innoculates the immune system, keeping it strong.
The advent of mechanical models of the universe affected philosophy and scientific thought as well. You can see how the advent of Copernicus' postulation in 1543 that the Earth orbited the Sun had a profound affect. Likewise, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes and Isaac Newtons' ideas fostered a burgeoning model of mechanistic life had effecuts upon the theories of medicine. The 'magic' was discounted in favor of 'scientific' medicine. Sometimes it wasn't very scientific and this baby and bathwater approach to deciding what was proper medicine ignored means of healing that were more effective. Common sense was often forgotten as well in the fervor for new ways that embraced the mechanistic models of science. (Note: This is my loose interpretation of these events, not a genuinely well-researched treatise.)
Anyhow, medicine in the Dark and Middle Ages was, in part, a reflection of the male-oriented allopathic physicians seeking to control healthcare over the grannies and midwives who used knowledge of plants and 'what worked' over high-falutin' ideas like cupping and starvation to heal illness. It was a product of religious and social tensions as much as it was about knowledge.
Starting with Hippocrites, who is credited as being the father of modern medicine, however in the middle ages, the collapse of the Greek and Roman empires caused a halt in the progression of medicine, and the repository of medical knowledge was maintained primarily at the monastery, which frequently had hospitals attached. (See Wikipedia article on Medieval medicine.) While astrology often got lumped in with medicine at this stage, herb craft and medicine practiced by outsiders--those who were not part of the religious heirarchy or doctors with political clout--were often labeled witches. And medical philosophy was increasingly tied in with the Christian world view.
As Wiki explains, "As Christianity grew in influence, a tension developed between the church and folk-medicine, since much in folk medicine was magical, or mystical, and had its basis in sources that were not compatible with Christian faith. Spells and incantations were used in conjunction with herbs and other remedies. Such spells had to be separated from the physical remedies, or replaced with Christian prayers or devotions. Similarly, the dependence upon the power of herbs or gems needed to be explained through Christianity.The church taught that God sometimes sent illness as a punishment, and that in these cases, repentance could lead to a recovery. This led to the practice of penance and pilgrimage as a means of curing illness."
How does this relate to your novel?
In a worldbuilding mode, you might need a conflict wherein your character is in conflict with society over what he/she knows works and what is allowed. Classic conflict for Church or State vs. Individual. Even Big Biz vs. the Little Guy. The motif is one of struggle against some amorphous juggernaut, a thing that cannot be stopped and must be either worked around or be crushed by it.
And hormesis, the idea that you can use a little of something to do good, could also be used in a magical scenario for your fantasy novel.
The important thing to take away from the discussion is, I believe, that large social institutions can influence--perhaps very wrongly--the growth and function of science. And it can be to the detriment of a society. The human Will To Be Stupid is so common...



Recent Comments